The U.S. Congress Effective Functioning

The U.S. Congress Effective Functioning It is believed that the members of the United States Congress are supposed to represent the will of the American people. They can sometimes be regarded as those people through whom voters can express their views on social problems, economic development of the country, its national security, and many other issues.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The U.S. Congress Effective Functioning specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More To a great extent, this assumption is quite justified because citizens are able to deny politicians access to power. Therefore, legislators are accountable to the American people. Nevertheless, one can argue that these policy-makers have to make compromises in the course of their work. Moreover, they can also be affected by lobbyists and interests groups. Therefore, they may not be able to promote the interests of people who elected them. These are the main issues that should be examined more closely. Fir st of all, one should know that the members of the U.S. Congress may not always reach an agreement regarding specific policies. Therefore, they have to discuss and sometimes change the provisions of certain laws or bills so that they could be accepted by the majority. They can partly accept the ideas of their opponents. It should be kept in mind that these legislators may represent different political or economic ideologies. As a result, these people have to make concessions to one another. This is one of the main aspects that can be identified because it is vital for describing decision-making in the United States Congress. Additionally, it should be taken into account that American citizens may various interests or priorities, and they cannot easily be reconciled. Thus, some compromises or concessions are inevitable. Apart from that, it is necessary to remember that lobbies and interest groups can play an important role in the political life of the United States. They can donate c apital to political parties as well as candidates. These lobbies can represent various industries or companies. Through lobbying these organizations can also promote their interests. This issue is also important for understanding the work of the U.S. Congress. Certainly, the activities of lobbies or interest groups are often criticized; nevertheless, the role has not decreased. Still, it is not reasonable to say that the members of the U.S. Congress are not accountable to American people. Such an assumption can hardly be called accurate. In this case, one should speak about such a mechanism as direct election through which citizens can express their disagreement with the policies of the Congress. They can simply refuse to vote for a politician who fails to meet the expectation of people. Therefore, voting can be viewed as a system of checks and balances that prevents these people from getting out of their commitments to American people. This point is also vital for understanding the interactions between citizens and legislators. One can argue that the efficiency and integrity of legislators depends on the activities of citizens and their willingness to monitor the work of politicians. This is the main condition for the effective functioning of the U.S. congress.Advertising Looking for essay on government? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More On the whole, this discussion indicates that American politicians cannot always serve only the interests of voters. Their work can be distorted because legislators have to reach compromises and respond to the needs of particular interest groups. Nevertheless, legislators are also accountable to citizens who can evaluate the performance of policymakers through the process of voting. These are the main points that can be made.

Political Culture and Good Citizenship

Political Culture and Good Citizenship Political culture is a widely shared set of ideas, attitudes, practices, and moral judgments that shape people’s political behavior, as well as how they relate to their government and to one another. In essence, the various elements of a political culture determine the people’s perception of who is and is not a â€Å"good citizen.† To an extent, the government itself can use outreach efforts like education and public commemorations of historical events to shape political culture and public opinion. When taken to excess, such attempts to control the political culture are often characteristic of the actions of totalitarian or fascist forms of government. While they tend to reflect the current character of the government itself, political cultures also embody the history and traditions of that government. For example, while Great Britain still has a monarchy, the queen or king has no real power without the approval of the democratically elected Parliament. Yet, while doing away with the now largely ceremonial monarchy would save the government millions of pounds per year, the British people, proud of their tradition of over 1,200 years of being ruled by royalty, would never stand for it. Today, as always, a â€Å"good† British citizen reveres the Crown. While political cultures vary greatly from nation to nation, state to state, and even region to region, they generally tend to remain relatively stable over time. Political Culture and Good Citizenship To a great degree, political culture implies the characteristics and qualities that make people good citizens. In the context of political culture, the traits of â€Å"good citizenship† transcend the government’s basic legal requirements for attaining citizenship status. As Greek philosopher Aristotle argued in his treatise Politics, simply living in a nation does not necessarily make a person a citizen of that nation. To Aristotle, true citizenship required a level of supportive participation. As we see today, thousands of lawful permanent resident aliens and immigrants live in the United States as â€Å"good citizens† as defined by the political culture without becoming fully naturalized citizens. Traits of Good Citizens Good citizens, in their daily lives, demonstrate most of the qualities considered important by the prevailing political culture. A person who lives an otherwise exemplary life but never works to support or improve the community by taking an active part in public life may be considered a good person but not necessarily a good citizen. In the United States, a good citizen is generally expected to do at least some of these things: Take part in the representative democracy by registering to vote and voting in elections.Run for elected office or volunteer to serve on appointed governing boards.Obey all federal, state, and local laws.Show up for jury duty if called.Be knowledgeable of the basic freedoms, rights, and responsibilities contained in the U.S. Constitution.Pay all applicable federal, state, and local taxes.Remain knowledgeable about political issues and government policy.Volunteer to take part in community improvement programs.Take part in patriotic observances and traditions, like standing for the National Anthem and knowing the Pledge of Allegiance. Even within the United States, the perception of political culture - thus good citizenship - may vary from region to region. As a result, it important to avoid depending on stereotypes when judging a person’s quality of citizenship. For example, people in one region may place more importance in strict observance of patriotic traditions than those in other regions. Political Culture Can Change Though it often takes generations to happen, minds - and thus political culture - can change. For example: Since its colonial period, America has seen periods during which the dominating political culture favored a policy of isolationism from foreign affairs, particularly foreign wars. In each of these cases, threats that foreign wars might directly threaten American lives and freedoms resulted in rapid reversals of the isolationist political culture.As part of President Lyndon Johnson’s sweeping Great Society social reform initiative, Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Passed after generations of post-Civil war racial discrimination, the law authorized the use of federal troops to supervise elections in several Southern states in order to protect the voting rights of black Americans. Forty years later, fearing that the racially-charged political culture in the South might still be a threat to the political freedom of blacks, Congress and President George W. Bush enacted the Voting Rights Extension Act of 2006. Today, multi-racial voting coalitions exist throughout the nation and Black-Americans are commonly elected to federal, state, and local offices. While some political cultures can be changed by the passage of laws, others cannot. In general, elements of a political culture based on deeply-seated beliefs or customs, such as patriotism, religion, or ethnicity are far more resistant to change than those based simply on the government’s policies or practices. Political Culture and US Nation Building While it is always difficult and sometimes dangerous, governments often try to influence the political culture of other nations. For example, the United States is known for its often-controversial foreign policy practice called â€Å"nation-building† - efforts to convert foreign governments to American-style democracies, often through the use of armed forces. In October 2000, President George W. Bush came out against nation-building, stating, â€Å"I dont think our troops ought to be used for whats called nation-building. I think our troops ought to be used to fight and win war.† But just 11 months later, the September 11, 2001 terror attacks changed the president’s perspective. As an outgrowth of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the United States has attempted to establish democracies in those nations. However, political cultures have hindered those U.S. nation-building efforts. In both countries, years of long-standing attitudes toward other ethnic groups, religions, women, and human rights shaped by years of tyrannical rule continue to stand in the way.